Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP43107) and 2 other sources
In the late summer of 2009, a family in Memphis, Tennessee, was fractured by circumstances that would lead to a lasting mystery. On August 29th, 42-year-old Bernardino Guillen, a Hispanic/Latino male, vanished from his home in the 38128 zip code area of Memphis. At the time he went missing, he was described as being between 5 feet 6 inches and 5 feet 8 inches tall, and weighing between 225 and 235 pounds, with black hair and brown eyes. When last seen, he was reportedly wearing a gray shirt, blue jeans, and black tennis shoes, along with a gold necklace. The events immediately preceding his disappearance were fraught with turmoil. Mr. Guillen went missing following an accusation from his seven-year-old relative. This troubling allegation cast a dark shadow over the circumstances of his sudden departure, leaving his family and investigators with a complex and sensitive situation to navigate. The report of his disappearance was not made to the Memphis Police Department until September 11, 2009, nearly two weeks after he was last seen.

The investigation into Bernardino Guillen's whereabouts was opened by the Memphis Police Department, under agency case number 0909006092ME. Despite the passage of years, his case remains open, a lingering question in the files of missing persons. His information was entered into the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System on April 16, 2018, under case number MP43107, a significant time after he was initially reported missing. This national database provides a centralized location for information about missing persons, but even with this broader visibility, no definitive answers about Mr. Guillen's fate have emerged. The official record notes the deeply personal and distressing nature of his disappearance, specifically mentioning the accusation that preceded it. This detail remains a critical, yet unresolved, element of the case, leaving a void where a family once was.

The search for Bernardino Guillen has been a long and quiet one, with little to no public developments over the years. The lack of new information has left his case suspended in time, a snapshot of a man who was there one day and gone the next. For his family, the uncertainty is a heavy burden to bear, the not-knowing a constant presence. The case itself is an overview of how personal crisis can intersect with a public mystery. A man, a husband, a member of a family, disappeared under a cloud of serious allegations, creating a complex narrative with no clear resolution. Whether he chose to flee, or met with foul play, remains unknown. The only certainty is the absence he left behind, a palpable void in the lives of those who knew him, and a cold case file that awaits a final chapter.

Last Seen: Aug 29, 2009

Possible Unidentified Matches (3)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

78%Possible
John Doe — Memphis, Tennessee
UP125661 • Found Dec 25, 2020
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 77%Est. 20–40 vs 42 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%9 mi away, same county
TimingFound 11 years after last seen
Height 84%5'4" vs 5'6"–5'8"
Weight 58%158 lb vs 225–235 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
78%Possible
John Doe — Memphis, Tennessee
UP13584 • Found Oct 29, 2014
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 45–65 vs 42 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%9 mi away, same county
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'6"–5'8"
77%Possible
John Doe — Arlington, Tennessee
UP10153 • Found Dec 4, 2010
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 30–50 vs 42 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 99%15 mi away, same county
TimingFound 15 months after last seen
Height 75%5'3"–5'11" vs 5'6"–5'8"

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.