298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.
Forum Posts for Kathleen Durst: Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.
Did anyone else notice how bizarre it was that Kathleen was reported missing by her friends and not her husband? From what I’ve gathered, Robert Durst didn't even seem to act like she was missing! It wasn't until four days later that her friends took action. I can't shake the feeling that this is significant—almost like he wanted to avoid drawing attention to her disappearance for as long as possible. If he genuinely thought she’d gone back to NYC, wouldn’t the first step be checking with her friends and family immediately? It’s unsettling how often these little details get overlooked in long-standing cases like this one. Just makes me think, what else was missed? Thoughts?
Send Private Message
Characters: 0/5000
Has anyone else been fascinated by the timeline discrepancies in Kathleen Durst's case? Especially in how Robert Durst's story differs each time it's recounted? I remember reading somewhere—or maybe it was in one of those documentaries—that the train drop-off never matched any schedules or records from that night. It's like the more you dig into it, the more questions arise, you know? Plus, if she did make it back to Manhattan, there should’ve been sightings or at least a paper trail in some form, but it’s like she vanished into thin air. Are there any local NY folks here familiar with that train route or the service back then who can shed some light on this? It feels like such a crucial piece to this puzzle is missing, and I'm curious if anyone has explored this in more depth or found any leads.